Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuser, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T12:02:48Z
dc.date.available2022-05-05T12:02:48Z
dc.date.created2020-07-07T08:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRuser, A. (2020). A Mission for MARS: The Success of Climate Change Skeptic Rhetoric in the US. Res Rhetorica, 7 (2), 47-63.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2392-3113
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994374
dc.description.abstractRadio and television broadcasters accuse climate scientists of “promoting a global warming hoax”, recommending that they be “named and fi red, drawn and quartered” (Rush Limbaugh); commit “hara kiri” (Glenn Beck); and be “publicly fl ogged” (Mark Morano). Conservative media are crucial in promoting climate skepticism. Likewise, climate skepticism resonates well with white middle-class men. But why does the middle class continue to support “radical” positions? This article focuses on Anti-Intellectualism to explain why climate skeptic rhetoric resonates with “Middle American Radicals” (MARS).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPolish Rhetoric Societyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Mission for MARS: The Success of Climate Change Skeptic Rhetoric in the USen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber47-63en_US
dc.source.volume7en_US
dc.source.journalRes Rhetoricaen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29107/rr2020.2.4
dc.identifier.cristin1818796
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal