Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRuser, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T12:02:48Z
dc.date.available2022-05-05T12:02:48Z
dc.date.created2020-07-07T08:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRuser, A. (2020). A Mission for MARS: The Success of Climate Change Skeptic Rhetoric in the US. Res Rhetorica, 7 (2), 47-63.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2392-3113
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994374
dc.description.abstractRadio and television broadcasters accuse climate scientists of “promoting a global warming hoax”, recommending that they be “named and fi red, drawn and quartered” (Rush Limbaugh); commit “hara kiri” (Glenn Beck); and be “publicly fl ogged” (Mark Morano). Conservative media are crucial in promoting climate skepticism. Likewise, climate skepticism resonates well with white middle-class men. But why does the middle class continue to support “radical” positions? This article focuses on Anti-Intellectualism to explain why climate skeptic rhetoric resonates with “Middle American Radicals” (MARS).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPolish Rhetoric Societyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Mission for MARS: The Success of Climate Change Skeptic Rhetoric in the USen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber47-63en_US
dc.source.volume7en_US
dc.source.journalRes Rhetoricaen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29107/rr2020.2.4
dc.identifier.cristin1818796
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal