| dc.description.abstract | This research project aimed to identify resource deficiencies in F-16 crew chief training. Initial feedback suggested the primary issue was the lack of an operational aircraft, though the data was insufficient to confirm this definitively. Employing Human-Centered Design (HCD) as the main methodology, the project focused on understanding the needs of students, teachers, and managers within the training program. HCD's iterative and user-focused approach, combined with expertise in human factors, F-16 operations, and learning theories, informed the research process.
Qualitative data was gathered through an electronic questionnaire and interviews with trainees who had completed the initial course and experienced its limitations firsthand. Analysis identified a significant gap in training resources, particularly the absence of a working engine necessary for launch and recovery procedures—high-risk tasks requiring meticulous safety protocols. Interview data was categorized into themes of training resources, attitude and culture, safety and human factors, and suggestions for innovation.
The findings highlighted critical shortcomings in the existing Training Needs Analysis and the psychomotor skills framework based on Bloom's taxonomy, exacerbated by the mismatch with the Romanian Air Force's procedures. The study revealed that inadequate resources led to procedural exceptions and alternative methods, impacting both trainee and instructor attitudes towards safety and adherence to protocols. Furthermore, cultural differences among instructors contributed to confusion among trainees.
To address these issues, stakeholders proposed various technological solutions, including haptic feedback devices, instructional videos, augmented reality for hazard visualization, and remote assistance technologies. These solutions, aligned with HCD principles, aim to enhance training effectiveness and foster a community of practice that supports continuous competence development. This preliminary research lays the groundwork for a comprehensive design effort to improve F-16 crew chief training through innovative technology integration. | |