The Dark Side of Projectification: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda on the Negative Aspects of Project Work and their consequences for individual project workers
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Accepted version
View/ Open
Date
2022Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Aguilar Velasco, M. M. & Wald, A. E. (2022). The Dark Side of Projectification: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda on the Negative Aspects of Project Work and their Consequences for Individual Project Workers. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(2), 272-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2021-0117Abstract
Purpose Project work usually has a positive connotation and is considered innovative and modern. However, many project workers suffer from chronic stress, work overload and burnout. This study aims to integrate the determinants of the negative aspects of project work and their implications for individuals involved in projects. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review was used to analyze 290 papers from various disciplines to identify the most used theories, determinants of the negative aspects of project work and the consequences of these aspects for project participants' work-related and overall well-being. Findings Based on the findings of the review, this paper develops a multi-level framework that includes determinants at the levels of society, organizations, projects and individuals and discusses opportunities for further research. The findings show that socio-psychological theories and occupational health theories are the dominant theories used in research. The most frequently studied individual outcomes are affective symptoms and work-related outcomes. Detrimental individual outcomes are mostly associated with psychosocial work factors. Originality/value The study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive review of research on the negative aspects of project work and their implications for project workers. The multi-level framework can serve as a guide for future research and provides important insights for practitioners.
Description
Author's accepted manuscript