Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJohannesen, Nils Jakob
dc.contributor.authorKolhe, Mohan Lal
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Morten
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-08T12:40:22Z
dc.date.available2023-09-08T12:40:22Z
dc.date.created2019-02-15T08:57:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJohannesen, N. J., Kolhe, M. L. & Goodwin, M. (2019). Relative evaluation of regression tools for urban area electrical energy demand forecasting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 555-564.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3088334
dc.description.abstractLoad forecasting is the most fundamental application in Smart-Grid, which provides essential input to Demand Response, Topology Optimization and Abnormally Detection, facilitating the integration of intermittent clean energy sources. In this work, several regression tools are analyzed using larger datasets for urban area electrical load forecasting. The regression tools which are used are Random Forest Regressor, k-Nearest Neighbour Regressor and Linear Regressor. This work explores the use of regression tool for regional electric load forecasting by correlating lower distinctive categorical level (season, day of the week) and weather parameters. The regression analysis has been done on continuous time basis as well as vertical time axis approach. The vertical time approach is considering a sample time period (e.g seasonally and weekly) of data for four years and has been tested for the same time period for the consecutive year. This work has uniqueness in electrical demand forecasting using regression tools through vertical approach and it also considers the impact of meteorological parameters. This vertical approach uses less amount of data compare to continuous time-series as well as neural network techniques. A correlation study, where both the Pearson method and visual inspection, of the vertical approach depicts meaningful relation between pre-processing of data, test methods and results, for the regressors examined through Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). By examining the structure of various regressors they are compared for the lowest MAPE. Random Forest Regressor provides better short-term load prediction (30 min) and kNN offers relatively better long-term load prediction (24 h).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRelative evaluation of regression tools for urban area electrical energy demand forecastingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Elsevieren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500::Elektrotekniske fag: 540en_US
dc.source.pagenumber555-564en_US
dc.source.volume218en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Cleaner Productionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.108
dc.identifier.cristin1677516
dc.relation.projectUniversitetet i Agder: CAIRen_US
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal