Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBefus, Eva-Grethe
dc.contributor.authorHelseth, Sølvi
dc.contributor.authorMølland, Eirin
dc.contributor.authorWestergren, Per Christer Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFegran, Liv
dc.contributor.authorHaraldstad, Kristin
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T12:05:28Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T12:05:28Z
dc.date.created2023-01-30T15:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBefus, E-G., Helseth, S., Mølland, E., Westergren, P. C. T., Fegran, L., Haraldstad, K. (2023). Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21, 1-11.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3051474
dc.description.abstractPurpose Subjectively assessing health related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents is increasingly important in the public health field. One valid and widely used generic HRQoL instrument is the KIDSCREEN questionnaire. The aim of this study was to map all studies using KIDSCREEN instruments in the general population of children and adolescents aged 6–18 years. Methods A scoping review was conducted. The search strategy was formulated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews guidelines. The databases Cinahl, socINDEX, Medline, Embase, APA Psychinfo, Scopus, and Eric were searched in October 2021. Results In total, 1365 papers were eligible for screening, 1031 were excluded and 334 reports were read in full. 252 reports were included. KIDSCREEN studies in the general population was predominantly conducted in Europe (n = 211). Most studies (n = 179) had a cross sectional design, while few experimental studies (n = 24) were found. The three KIDSCREEN versions comprising of 10, 27 and 52 items, were equally distributed between studies. The self-reported version (n = 225) of the KIDSCREEN instrument was more prevalent than the proxy version, while few studies discussed a cut point. Study contexts reflected international trends of public health challenges, commonly including mental- and psychosocial health, physical activity, socioeconomic status, and obesity. Conclusion KIDSCREEN is widely used in cross sectional studies assessing common public health challenges. Experimental and longitudinal assessments, possibly including relevant cut offs remain mainly unexplored and are recommended for future research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUse of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents - A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z
dc.identifier.cristin2118700
dc.source.articlenumber6en_US
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal