| dc.contributor.author | Markussen, Bjarne | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-18T12:47:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-03-18T12:47:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Markussen, B. (2013). Kan teksttolking være vitenskap? Fire faghistoriske debatter. Edda. Nordisk tidsskrift for litteraturforskning 100(4), 290-310. | nb_NO |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0013-0818 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/192578 | |
| dc.description | Author's version of an article in the journal: Edda. Nordisk tidsskrift for litteraturforskning. Also avaliable from the publisher at: http://www.idunn.no/ts/edda/2013/04/kan_teksttolking_vaere_vitenskap_-_fire_faghistoriske_debat | nb_NO |
| dc.description.abstract | This article addresses four debates concerning scientific aspects of literary research in Norway in 1940-2010. It discusses the debates between Zapffe and Næss in the 1940s, Haakonsen and Bull in the 1950s, Aarseth and Elster in the 1980s, and Kittang og Bjerck Hagen in the 2000s. The article focuses on how each of these researchers defines “vitenskap” (research/science) and argues for a scientific standard in the interpretation of literary works. | nb_NO |
| dc.language.iso | nob | nb_NO |
| dc.publisher | Universitetsforlaget | nb_NO |
| dc.subject | VDP::Humaniora: 000::Litteraturvitenskapelige fag: 040::Nordisk litteratur: 042 | nb_NO |
| dc.title | Kan teksttolking være vitenskap? Fire faghistoriske debatter | nb_NO |
| dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
| dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
| dc.source.pagenumber | 290-310 | nb_NO |
| dc.source.volume | 100 | nb_NO |
| dc.source.journal | Edda. Nordisk tidsskrift for litteraturforskning | nb_NO |
| dc.source.issue | 4 | nb_NO |
