dc.contributor.author | Zackariasson, Ulf | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-21T12:52:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-21T12:52:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Zackariasson, U. (2011). What's wrong with the adequacy-argument? A pragmatic diagnosis. Sophia, 50(1), 11-23. doi: 10.1007/s11841-009-0153-0 | no_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0038-1527 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/139637 | |
dc.description | Published version of an article in the journal: Sophia, 50(1), 11-23. Also available from the publisher at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11841-009-0153-0 | no_NO |
dc.description.abstract | When confronted with the question of which philosophical conception of religion to consider most adequate, many philosophers appeal to what I call the adequacy-argument: that we should prefer the one that looks most adequate from the perspective of religious believers. In this paper, I provide a critique of the adequacy-argument based on a pragmatic analysis of adequacy-judgments according to which reflective adequacy-judgments are forward-looking, and hence include considerations of the consequences of adopting different judgments as guides for conduct. It is this forward-looking character that is virtually absent within the current adequacy-debate. The major advantage of a pragmatic analysis of adequacy is itself forward-looking: it would enable philosophers of religion to play a more critical and constructive role vis-A -vis religious practices than presently. | no_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | no_NO |
dc.publisher | Springer | no_NO |
dc.subject | adequacy-argument, adequacy, judgements, pragmatism, Dewey | no_NO |
dc.title | What's wrong with the adequacy-argument? A pragmatic diagnosis | no_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | no_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | no_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Humanities: 000::Philosophical disciplines: 160::Philosophy: 161 | no_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 11-23 | no_NO |
dc.source.volume | 50 | no_NO |
dc.source.journal | Sophia | no_NO |
dc.source.issue | 1 | no_NO |