Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSang, Lian Thang Peter
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-02T12:12:33Z
dc.date.available2013-10-02T12:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/136540
dc.descriptionMasteroppgave i offentlig politikk og ledelse - Universitetet i Agder 2013no_NO
dc.description.abstractMyanmar was known for decades as one of the most isolated nations on earth, but after 2010 election, the country is rapidly moving forward to be an open, free and integrated part of international community, thereby bringing positive hope and expectation to the Burmese people and democratic nations worldwide. With an accelerating speed of reforms taking place, the government that used to be under the command of one man finds governing the whole reforms process as major challenges. Therefore, the government becomes consciously aware and acknowledges publicly that citizen’s participation in all sectors is indispensable to have better governance and peace in multi-ethnic and multi-cultural Myanmar. The thesis is a qualitative study primarily investigating and analyzing the role of Civil Society (CS hereafter) in promoting democracy, good governance, peace and national reconciliation in Myanmar. The study firstly reviews the traditional concept of CS and reconceptualizes it to better suit the cultural and political context of Myanmar. The study also identifies different CS actors and groups them into different categories; analyzes challenges, success and constraint in relation to their respective relationship with the people, the state and among themselves. To support my hypothesis, field research was also conducted in March 2012 in Yangon, Myanmar. The study explores the existence and significance of CS mainly in three different periods in Myanmar modern history; pre-independence (prior to 1948), after independence (1948-2010) and from 2010 election to this date. In the process of exploring, this study identifies different types of CS actors inside Myanmar, across the border and in other countries actively working for democracy, good governance, peace and national reconciliation. The study also investigates the relationship between SC and the people, the state, among different CS actors and also challenges faced under oppressive military regime and prospects under the current political atmosphere. With a growing interest in the CS role and impact they generated, some even contend that reforms in Myanmar are products of CS active involvement. This study however argues that despite important and significant contribution of CS, their roles were rather limited to social humanitarian goals rather than bringing political changes because of harsh and yet systematic restriction of military regimes. Recent rapid yet systematic shift in political landscape The country name ‘Burma’ was changed to ‘Myanmar’ by previous military regime in 1989, but the United Nation recognized ‘Myanmar’ as official name. 6 particularly after the 2010 election has opened wider opportunities for CS to engage more effectively across the country socio economic spectrum. The study also investigates and compares changes in CS role between prior to and after the election in 2010. Through qualitative combined with empirical analysis, the study confirms that CS plays significant role in promoting democracy, good governance, peace and national reconciliation in Myanmar. The author finds though that CS still lacks capacity and human resource necessary for a more coordinated and collaborative force to generate effective and vibrant impact on reform in the three areas; democracy, good governance and peace or national reconciliation. The thesis concludes with a summary of discussion, findings and suggestions for stakeholders and future researchers in order that the future role of CS is more effective in enhancing the current reforms process.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.subject.classificationME 502
dc.titleThe role of civil society in promoting democracy, good governance, peace and national reconciliation in Myanmarno_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber90 p.no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel