Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStea, Tonje Holte
dc.contributor.authorBertelsen, Thomas Bjerregaard
dc.contributor.authorFegran, Liv
dc.contributor.authorSejersted, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorKleppang, Annette Løvheim
dc.contributor.authorFyhn, Tonje
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T12:32:48Z
dc.date.available2024-08-06T12:32:48Z
dc.date.created2024-07-04T16:02:48Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationStea, T. H., Bertelsen, T. B., Fegran, L., Sejersted, E., Kleppang, A. L. & Fyhn, T. (2024). Interventions targeting young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) for increased likelihood of return to school or employment-A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 19(6), 1-17. doi:en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3144745
dc.description.abstractThe present systematic review aims to identify, synthesize, and evaluate evidence of effects from interventions targeting youth not in education, employment, or training (NEET). We searched relevant multidisciplinary databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized re-engagement trials. Primary outcomes were participation in education and employment, and training status. Secondary outcomes included changes in financial status, quality of life and well-being, social functioning, and physical, psychological, and behavioral outcomes. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA guidelines were applied. Eligible studies were screened, included, and extracted for data. Nine trials were included (eight RCTs and one quasi-experimental study), in which samples ranged from 96 to 7346 participants. Results on primary outcomes showed that five studies found an effect of interventions on employment outcomes, while three studies indicated an effect on education or training. Results on secondary outcomes included effects on mental health, subjective health complaints, drug use, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Studies with other main outcomes than re-engagement showed an effect of interventions on pass rates for the driving test, independent housing, and increased job-seeking activities. Limitations and future directions are discussed, including the lack of rigorous studies, theoretical underpinnings, and standardized measures for re-engagement outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInterventions targeting young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) for increased likelihood of return to school or employment-A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750en_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0306285
dc.identifier.cristin2281149
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal