Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerliner, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T10:58:51Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T10:58:51Z
dc.date.created2024-05-21T13:59:09Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationBerliner, D. (2024). Essays on Investors' Decision-Making in Equity-Based Crowdfunding [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Agder.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-8427-193-4
dc.identifier.issn1504-9272
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3131691
dc.descriptionPaper I has been extracted from the dissertation pending publication.
dc.description.abstractEquity crowdfunding (ECF) is a fast-growing source of equity financing for entrepreneurial ventures, complementary to existing actors within the entrepreneurial finance domain, such as business angels and venture capital funds (Hornuf & Schwienbacher, 2018; Tuomi & Harrison, 2017; Vismara, 2022). For example, in 2021, 573 (23%) of all investment rounds in the UK utilized ECF, making it the third most active actor, after business angels (BA), accounting for 602 deals (24%), and private equity and venture capital firms (VC) facilitating 1,359 deals (54%) (Beauhurst, 2022). ECF can also be a disruptive form of bypassing traditional sources of equity financing, such as BA and VC, by raising capital from a large group of people (Drover et al., 2017; Lehner et al., 2015; Lukkarinen et al., 2016). As such, it aims to at least partially fill the gap of a chronic shortage of access to early-stage finance for SMEs often underserved by traditional financial institutions and channels across the world (Bruhn et al., 2017), with 26% of European SMEs indicating this as a major concern in 2023 (European Central Bank, 2023). Furthermore, the high-risk profile of early-stage entrepreneurial ventures, their sometimes-modest expected returns, and high transaction costs associated with due diligence and emissions made these highly innovative firms less attractive for BA and VC. At the same time, the needed capital is too large for friends and family to cover, as well as for VCs to cover alone. Therefore, ECF might have the potential to fill the equity gap for these early-stage entrepreneurial ventures (Hornuf & Schmitt, 2016; Mason et al., 2016). Indeed, between 2011 and 2021, the majority of companies (53%) utilizing ECF were at the seed stage compared to only 33% backed by VC firms (Beauhurst, 2022). The 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startup Act (JOBS Act), signed by the President of the United States, dramatically affected the entrepreneurial finance landscape by legalizing ECF, opening new opportunities to both entrepreneurs and investors. Entrepreneurs were allowed to sell limited amounts of equity in their companies, and investors were provided with new opportunities to diversify their investment portfolios (Stemler, 2013). Since the 2012 JOBS Act and the legalization of ECF, the field of research for entrepreneurial financing has seen a growing interest among…en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversitetet i Agderen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDoctoral dissertations at University of Agder
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDoctoral dissertations at University of Agder; No. 476
dc.relation.haspartPaper I: Berliner, D., Shneor, R. & Wald, A. (2024). Decision-Making Criteria Among Serial, Occasional, and One-Time Equity Crowdfunding Investors when Evaluating Technology-Based Ventures. Under review in Venture Capital : an International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance. Submitted manuscript. Full-text is not available in AURA as a separate file.
dc.relation.haspartPaper II: Berliner, D., Shneor, R. & Capizzi, V. (2024). Venture Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty and Human Capital in Equity Crowdfunding: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Under review in International Small Business Journal. Submitted manuscript. Full-text is not available in AURA as a separate file.
dc.relation.haspartPaper III: Berliner, D., Shneor, R. & Wald, A. (2024). Decision-Making Criteria Among Serial, Occasional, and One-Time Equity Crowdfunding Investors when Evaluating Technology-Based Ventures. Under Review in Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Submitted manuscript. Full-text is not available in AURA as a separate file.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEssays on Investors' Decision-Making in Equity-Based Crowdfundingen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Daniel Berlineren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210en_US
dc.source.pagenumber180en_US
dc.source.issue476en_US
dc.identifier.cristin2269849


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal