Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorClowes, David
dc.contributor.authorChoros-Mrozowska, Dominika
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Gorm
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T12:22:14Z
dc.date.available2023-06-07T12:22:14Z
dc.date.created2022-11-28T09:56:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationClowes, D., Choros-Mrozowska, D. & Jacobsen, G. (2022). China’s Contribution to the Economic Potential of the 16+1 Platform: Developments Prior to the Global Pandemic. European Research Studies Journal, 25 (2), 277-289.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1108-2976
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3070374
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The 16+1 platform, first introduced by China in 2012, provides a framework for Central and Eastern (CE) European countries to benefit from economic cooperation with China. This paper seeks to ascertain which countries have benefitted the most and under what conditions. Design/Methodology/Approach: The work introduces a quantitative methods model to measure the economic potential (EP) of all sixteen countries as a share of the total for the platform group, using variables on natural and human resources, economic scale as well as each country’s bilateral cooperation with China. Findings: The EP indexes reveal that China initially contributed more in terms of trade and/or investment to the more sizeable countries of the EU – especially, the Visegrad group of four and two of the EU Balkan countries, Romania and Bulgaria. However, sizeable non-EU Balkan countries, which are strategically located, have also benefitted, though this is predominantly in the form of Chinese foreign investment with infrastructure being one of the key areas. Practical Implications: The 16+1 platform is a long-term project and, if treated as a regional group of countries, necessitates injections of further investment into infrastructure development and also trade stimulation between China and those countries that have yet to benefit. Originality/Value: This research provides an analysis of the economic potential of each of the countries belonging to the 16+1 platform with the inclusion of China. This was carried out using a model constructed to measure multiple variables on country and population size, economic scale and Chinese trade and investment. The sum of the variables provides an EP index for each country and for the platform as a whole.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Strategic Management Association (ISMA), E. Thalassinosen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleChina’s Contribution to the Economic Potential of the 16+1 Platform: Developments Prior to the Global Pandemicen_US
dc.title.alternativeChina’s Contribution to the Economic Potential of the 16+1 Platform: Developments Prior to the Global Pandemicen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210en_US
dc.source.pagenumber277-289en_US
dc.source.volume25en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Research Studies Journalen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.35808/ersj/2920
dc.identifier.cristin2082123
dc.relation.projectCracow University of Economics: 4/EEE/2020/POTen_US
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal