Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGabrielsen, Karin Berle
dc.contributor.authorClausen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHaugland, Siri Håvås
dc.contributor.authorHollup, Stig Arvid
dc.contributor.authorVederhus, John-Kåre
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T09:46:22Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T09:46:22Z
dc.date.created2022-09-13T11:49:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGabrielsen, K. B., Clausen, T., Haugland, S. H., Hollup, S. A. & Vederhus, J.-K. (2022). Infralow neurofeedback in the treatment of substance use disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 47 (3), 222-229.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1488-2434
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3059736
dc.description.abstractBackground Infralow neurofeedback (ILF-NF) was recently developed as a subtype of traditional, frequency-based neurofeedback that targets cerebral rhythmic activity below 0.5 Hz and improves brain self-regulation. The efficacy of ILF-NF in the treatment of substance use disorder has not yet been evaluated, but clinical evidence suggests that it may prevent relapse by improving functioning in various life domains. The current study aimed to fill this research gap and extend empirical evidence related to this issue. Methods Ninety-three patients with substance use disorders at an outpatient unit in Norway were randomized to receive 20 sessions (30 minutes each) of ILF-NF training combined with treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU alone. The primary outcome was quality of life post-treatment as an overall measure of functioning. We analyzed between-group differences using Student t tests. Results We found no significant differences in quality of life between groups. We found similar nonsignificant results for most of the secondary outcome measures, including drug use, sleep, anxiety and depression. Compared to TAU, the ILF-NF + TAU group reported significantly lower restlessness scores post-treatment (mean difference −1.8, 95 % confidence interval −3.1 to −0.5; p = 0.006). Limitations: This study was limited by broad inclusion criteria and a lack of placebo control (sham neurofeedback treatment). Conclusion ILF-NF offered limited additional benefit when combined with TAU, except in the area of restlessness. Future studies could further investigate the relationship between ILF-NF, restlessness and substance use in targeted subpopulations to illuminate relapse mechanisms.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOviden_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInfralow neurofeedback in the treatment of substance use disorders: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.title.alternativeInfralow neurofeedback in the treatment of substance use disorders: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757en_US
dc.source.pagenumber222-229en_US
dc.source.volume47en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Psychiatry & Neuroscienceen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210202
dc.identifier.cristin2051162
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal