Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMalodia, Suresh
dc.contributor.authorKaur, Puneet
dc.contributor.authorRactham, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSakashita, Mototaka
dc.contributor.authorDhir, Amandeep
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T12:08:23Z
dc.date.available2022-09-08T12:08:23Z
dc.date.created2022-04-29T10:07:11Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMalodia, S., Kaur, P., Ractham, P., Sakashita, M. & Dhir, A. (2022). Why do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theory. Journal of Business Research, 146, 605-618.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1873-7978
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3016614
dc.description.abstractConsumers increasingly adopt artificial intelligence (AI) enabled voice assistants (VAs) for transactional and non-transactional uses due to these devices’ inherent affordances, such as their ease of use and convenience. Despite the widespread adoption of VAs in recent times, consumers continue to avoid using VAs for transactional purposes. Currently, we have a limited understanding of the various antecedents and consequences of consumer decision avoidance in the context of VAs. This study aims to bridge this gap by adopting the decision avoidance theory as a theoretical lens and a convergent mixed-methods approach to identify the antecedents (i.e. cognitive biases and nudging) and consequences (i.e. rejection of VAs for transactional purposes and intention to adopt VAs for transactional purposes) of consumer decision avoidance (i.e. consumer inertia and procrastination). The study findings suggest a positive association of cognitive biases with consumer inertia, procrastination and rejection. While nudging is positively associated with procrastination and intentions, it shares a negative association with rejection. Consumer inertia is positively associated with rejection and negatively associated with intentions. Meanwhile, procrastination shares a positive association with intention and a negative association with rejection. Technology comfort has a significant moderating (negative) influence on the association between cognitive biases and intentions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWhy do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theoryen_US
dc.title.alternativeWhy do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theoryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber605-618en_US
dc.source.volume146en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Business Researchen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.045
dc.identifier.cristin2020018
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal