Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFässler, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorBogunović Jakobsen, Aleksander
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-21T07:28:02Z
dc.date.available2022-04-21T07:28:02Z
dc.date.created2021-05-14T14:20:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationFässler, B. Bogunović Jakobsen, A. (2021). Autonomous Operation of Stationary Battery Energy Storage Systems—Optimal Storage Design and Economic Potential. Energies, 14 (5).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2991809
dc.description.abstractGlobal warming requires a changeover from fossil fuel based to renewable energy sources on the electrical supply side and electrification of the demand side. Due to the transient nature of renewables and fluctuating demand, buffer capacities are necessary to compensate for supply/demand imbalances. Battery energy storage systems are promising. However, the initial costs are high. Repurposing electric vehicle batteries can reduce initial costs. Further, storage design optimization could significantly improve costs. Therefore, a battery control algorithm was developed, and a simulation study was performed to identify the optimal storage design and its economic potential. The algorithm used is based on autonomous (on-site) optimization, which relies on an incentive determining the operation mode (charge, discharge, or idle). The incentive used was the historic day-ahead stock market price for electricity, and the resulting potential economic gains for different European countries were compared for the years 2015–2019. This showed that there is a correlation between economic gain, optimal storage design (capacity-to-power ratio), and the mean standard deviation, as well as the mean relative change of the different day-ahead prices. Low yearly mean standard deviations of about 0.5 Euro Cents per kWh battery capacity lead to yearly earnings of about 1 €/kWh, deviations of 1 Euro Cent to 10 €/kWh, and deviations of 2 Euro Cents to 20 €/kWh. Small yearly mean relative changes, lower than 5%, lead to capacity-to-power ratios greater than 3, relative changes around 10% to an optimal capacity-to-power between 1.5 and 3, and for relative changes greater than 10% to an optimal capacity-to-power ratios of 1. While in countries like the United Kingdom, high potential earnings are expected, the economic prospective in countries like Norway is low due to limited day-ahead price performance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAutonomous Operation of Stationary Battery Energy Storage Systems—Optimal Storage Design and Economic Potentialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/en14051333
dc.identifier.cristin1910052
dc.source.articlenumber1333en_US
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal