Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrandberg, Emelie
dc.contributor.authorBean, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorVassbakk-Svindland, Karianne
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, Hannah L.
dc.contributor.authorSjövall, Katarina
dc.contributor.authorBörjeson, Sussanne
dc.contributor.authorBerntsen, Sveinung
dc.contributor.authorNordin, Karin
dc.contributor.authorDemmelmaier, Ingrid
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T10:43:16Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T10:43:16Z
dc.date.created2021-10-13T14:58:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationStrandberg, E., Bean, C., Vassbakk-Svindland, K, . Brooke, H.L., Sjövall, K., Börjeson, S., Berntsen, S., Nordin, K. & Demmelmaier, I. (2021) Who makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCT Supportive Care in Cancer. 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2835958
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare sociodemographic, health- and exercise-related characteristics of participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in an exercise intervention trial during cancer treatment. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were invited to participate in a 6-month exercise intervention. Background data for all respondents (n=2051) were collected at baseline by questionnaire and medical records. Additional data were collected using an extended questionnaire, physical activity monitors, and ftness testing for trial participants (n=577). Moreover, a sub-group of decliners (n = 436) consented to additional data collection by an extended questionnaire . Data were analyzed for between-group diferences using independent t-tests and chi2 -tests. Results Trial participants were younger (59±12yrs vs. 64±11yrs, p<.001), more likely to be women (80% vs. 75%, p=.012), and scheduled for chemotherapy treatment (54% vs. 34%, p<.001), compared to decliners (n=1391). A greater proportion had university education (60% vs 40%, p<.001), reported higher anxiety and fatigue, higher exercise self-efcacy and outcome expectations, and less kinesiophobia at baseline compared to decliners. A greater proportion of trial participants were classifed as ‘not physically active’ at baseline; however, within the group who participated, being “physically active” at baseline was associated with trial completion. Completers (n=410) also reported less kinesiophobia than drop-outs (n=167). Conclusion The recruitment procedures used in comprehensive oncology exercise trials should specifcally address barriers for participation among men, patients without university education and older patients. Individualized eforts should be made to enroll patients with low exercise self-efcacy and low outcome expectations of exercise. To retain participants in an ongoing exercise intervention, extra support may be needed for patients with kinesiophobia and those lacking healthenhancing exercise habits at baseline.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWho makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCTen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1739-1748en_US
dc.source.journalSupportive Care in Canceren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-021-06576-0
dc.identifier.cristin1945636
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal