Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorMonaghan, John David
dc.contributor.advisorHadjerrouit, Said
dc.contributor.authorHillesund, Eivind Rudjord
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-12T08:24:51Z
dc.date.available2021-01-12T08:24:51Z
dc.date.created2021-01-04T11:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHillesund, E. R. (2020). The resource decisions and documents of undergraduate engineering students in mathematics courses (Doctoral thesis). University of Agder, Kristiansand.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-8427-010-4
dc.identifier.issn1504-9272
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2722455
dc.description.abstractThis thesis concerns a multiple case study, carried out at three Norwegian universities. The goal was to find similarities and differences between how engineering students from different university contexts used resources to learn mathematics, and how they made decisions regarding their use of resources. My project had an inductive focus, networking thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) with the theoretical framework of the documentational approach to didactics (Gueudet & Trouche, 2009). After my analysis, I also compared my results and conclusions to those of authors who have conducted research projects with a similar focus (i.e. Anastasikis, 2018; Gueudet & Pepin, 2016; Kanwal, 2018; Pepin & Kock, 2019). I generally found that my results were consistent with their reflections, but I had also identified trends that went beyond the ideas within the field. Given the wide focus of the project, the result are numerous, and vary greatly in generality and theoretic value. There are two overarching results that I consider particularly significant to the field of research: I identify an overall structure to students’ decision regarding resources. Students almost exclusively consider resources that are emphasized within the course at hand; that they are familiar with from previous educational experiences or that they are familiar with from non-mathematical activities (for instance YouTube and Google). They primarily make their decisions based on what seems suitable for the task at hand, with preference as a secondary concern. Examinations have a significant impact on what they consider suitable. Their preference for resources are based on quality criteria such as simplicity and that they are able to use the resources efficiently. I introduce the notion of didactical resource purposes. Students use resources for the four purposes of introduction, practice, evaluation and explanation. That is, they use resources to learn the theory and foundations of a topic; to gain experience working mathematically within the confines of the topic; to evaluate their answers, their learning process or their understanding of the topic and to actively search for information when they realize that there is a fact that they do not recall or an aspect of the topic that they do not understand well enough to accomplish their goals.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher07 Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDoctoral Dissertations at the University of Agder; no. 307
dc.titleThe resource decisions and documents of undergraduate engineering students in mathematics coursesen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Eivind Rudjord Hillesunden_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Matematikk: 410en_US
dc.source.pagenumber442en_US
dc.identifier.cristin1864701


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel