Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndelic, Nada
dc.contributor.authorBautz-Holter, Erik
dc.contributor.authorRonning, Pal
dc.contributor.authorOlafsen, Kjell
dc.contributor.authorSigurdardottir, Solrun
dc.contributor.authorSchanke, Anne-Kristine
dc.contributor.authorSveen, Unni
dc.contributor.authorTornas, Sveinung
dc.contributor.authorSandhaug, Maria
dc.contributor.authorRoe, Cecilie
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-08T07:22:48Z
dc.date.available2012-05-08T07:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationAndelic, N., Bautz-Holter, E., Ronning, P., Olafsen, K., Sigurdardottir, S., Schanke, A.-K., . . . Roe, C. (2012). Does an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury? Journal of Neurotrauma, 29(1), 66-74. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1811no_NO
dc.identifier.issn0897-7151
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/139015
dc.descriptionPublished version of an article published in the journal: Journal of Neurotrauma. Also available from the publisher at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.1811no_NO
dc.description.abstractThere are currently no international guidelines regarding treatment in the early rehabilitation phase for persons with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and only a few studies have investigated the effect of integrating rehabilitation into acute TBI care. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether a continuous chain of rehabilitation that begins with the acute phase could improve the functional outcome of severe TBI patients, compared to a broken chain of rehabilitation that starts in the sub-acute phase of TBI. A total of 61 surviving patients with severe TBI were included in a quasi-experimental study conducted at the Level I trauma center in Eastern Norway. In the study, 31 patients were in the early rehabilitation group (Group A) and 30 patients were in the delayed rehabilitation group (Group B). The functional outcomes were assessed 12 months post-injury with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). A favorable outcome (GOSE 6-8) occurred in 71 % of the patients from Group A versus 37 % in Group B (p=0.007). The DRS score was significantly better in Group A (p=0.03). The ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to quantify the relationship between the type of rehabilitation chain and the GOSE. A better GOSE outcome was found in patients from Group A (unadjusted OR 3.25 and adjusted OR 2.78, respectively). These results support the hypothesis that better functional outcome occurs in patients who receive early onset and a continuous chain of rehabilitation.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebertno_NO
dc.subjectearly rehabilitationno_NO
dc.subjectfunctional outcomeno_NO
dc.subjectsevere TBIno_NO
dc.titleDoes an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury?no_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Health service and health administration research: 806no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber66-74no_NO
dc.source.volume29no_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Neurotraumano_NO
dc.source.issue1no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel