Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLeiren, Merethe Dotterud
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-25T09:18:26Z
dc.date.available2012-04-25T09:18:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1893-2347
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/139777
dc.descriptionPresentation on department page: http://www.uia.no/no/portaler/om_universitetet/oekonomi_og_samfunnsvitenskap/statsvitenskap_og_ledelsesfag/ forskning_isl/isl_working_papers_series
dc.description.abstractThe prevailing literature on European integration holds that asymmetries towards negative integration in the treaties are important for explaining increasing liberalisation reform in the EU. Additionally,literature on interest groups gives several reasons as to why labour unions are not likely to succeed at the EU level. However, to understand European integration, there is a need to also understand lack of integration. An in-depth analysis of the decision-making process of the EU Port Directive highlights the importance of actor constellations and inclusion of large societal groups such as labour unions in consultations.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherDepartment of Political Science and Management, University of Agderno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesISL Working Papers;2012:4
dc.titleWhen EU liberalisation fails: The case of the Port Directiveno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::Public and private administration: 242no_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240::International politics: 243no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

  • ISL Working Papers [29]
    Preprints, book chapters and reports from the Department of Political Science and Management, University of Agder

Vis enkel innførsel