• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences
  • Department of Psychososial Health
  • Scientific Publications in Psychososial Health
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences
  • Department of Psychososial Health
  • Scientific Publications in Psychososial Health
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

New quality regulations versus established nursing home practice: a qualitative study

Sandvoll, Anne Marie; Kristoffersen, Kjell; Hauge, Solveig
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
View/Open
Kristoffersen_2012_New.pdf (189.0Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/138756
Date
2012
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Scientific Publications in Psychososial Health [97]
Original version
Sandvoll, A., Kristoffersen, K., & Hauge, S. (2012). New quality regulations versus established nursing home practice: a qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 11(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-7  
Abstract
Background Western governments have initiated reforms to improve the quality of care for nursing home residents. Most of these reforms encompass the use of regulations and national quality indicators. In the Norwegian context, these regulations comprise two pages of text that are easy to read and understand. They focus particularly on residents’ rights to plan their day-to-day life in nursing homes. However, the research literature indicates that the implementation of the new regulations, particularly if they aim to change nursing practice, is extremely challenging. The aim of this study was to further explore and describe nursing practice to gain a deeper understanding of why it is so hard to implement the new regulations. Methods For this qualitative study, an ethnographic design was chosen to explore and describe nursing practice. Fieldwork was conducted in two nursing homes. In total, 45 nurses and nursing aides were included in participant observation, and 10 were interviewed at the end of the field study. Results Findings indicate that the staff knew little about the new quality regulations, and that the quality of their work was guided by other factors rooted in their nursing practice. Further analyses revealed that the staff appeared to be committed to daily routines and also that they always seemed to know what to do. Having routines and always knowing what to do mutually strengthen and enhance each other, and together they form a powerful force that makes daily nursing care a taken-for-granted activity. Conclusion New regulations are challenging to implement because nursing practices are so strongly embedded. Improving practice requires systematic and deeply rooted practical change in everyday action and thinking.
Description
Published version of an article from the journal: BMC Nursing. Also available from Bio Med Central:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-11-7 Open Access
Publisher
Bio Med Central
Journal
BMC Nursing

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit