Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSöderhamn, Ulrika
dc.contributor.authorDale, Bjørg
dc.contributor.authorSundsli, Kari
dc.contributor.authorTomstad, Solveig T
dc.contributor.authorSöderhamn, Olle
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-26T12:55:16Z
dc.date.available2012-07-26T12:55:16Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationSöderhamn, U., Dale, B., Sundsli, K., Tomstad, S. T., & Söderhamn, O. (2012). Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the Nutritional Form For the Elderly among older home-dwelling people. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 121. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s32502no_NO
dc.identifier.issn1178-2390
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/138685
dc.descriptionPublished version of an article from the journal: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Also available from Dove Press: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s32502no_NO
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Nutritional screening instruments need to be evaluated in terms of reliability and validity and being able to demonstrate sensitivity and specificity for use in clinical practice and research. The aims of this study were to test the reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Nutritional Form For the Elderly (NUFFE-NO) in a sample of older home-dwelling people, and to use the short form of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) as a standard. METHODS: A postal questionnaire, including the two instruments, background variables, and health-related questions, was sent to 6033 home-dwelling older people (65+ years) in southern Norway. In total, 2106 persons responded and were included. Data were analyzed statistically regarding homogeneity, concurrent and construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity of NUFFE-NO. RESULTS: A Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.71 and significant item-to-total correlations were obtained as measures of homogeneity. Concurrent validity was assessed by a correlation coefficient of -0.37 (P < 0.001) between NUFFE-NO and MNA-SF. NUFFE-NO could separate known nutritional at-risk groups as a measure of construct validity. A cut-off point of ≥4 for identification of older people at nutritional risk was found for NUFFE-NO with MNA-SF as a standard. CONCLUSION: NUFFE-NO shows adequate psychometric properties regarding homogeneity and construct validity. MNA-SF was not found to be the most suitable standard to use, because a low correlation coefficient was obtained as a measure of concurrent validity and a lower cut-off point was found compared with another study using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA(®)) as a standard for NUFFE-NO. The obtained cut-off point of ≥4 is not recommended for use in practice or research, because many false positive nutritional at-risk persons would then be identified. Further studies with suitable design have to be performed among older home-dwelling people using the MNA as a standard.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherDove Pressno_NO
dc.titlePsychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the Nutritional Form For the Elderly among older home-dwelling peopleno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Nursing science: 808no_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Geriatrics: 778no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber121-128no_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcareno_NO
dc.source.issue5no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel