Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAamli, Jostein
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Bendik
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-17T07:42:53Z
dc.date.available2019-09-17T07:42:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2617114
dc.descriptionMasteroppgave bygg BYG508 - Universitetet i Agder 2019nb_NO
dc.description.abstractIn the preliminary project it was stated that Strauman 3 had been deteriorated so significantly that replacement isnecessary. The damage havebeen reported as critical for abouttwentyyears.Theplatebridge is located in Vesterålen and spans 5.9 meters with two lanes. The accumulated damage is a result ofaninsufficient concrete cover to withstand theexposure conditions. This project concerns the designof different bridge proposals that may begood solutionsfor the replacement of Strauman 3. In this process, several proposals are sketched. Among these,both traditional and innovative solutionsare presented. Once all the suggestions have been outlined, they will go through a selection process. The solutions that show the highest potential is later designed in detail according to relevant standards. Selection is done by describingpros and conswhich appear through engineering judgement and discussion. The main focus of this report is the structural engineering aspects with each bridge proposal. Nevertheless, wewill also focus on the environmental factors associated with global warming potential (GWP), more specifically, CO2-­‐equivalents. These calculations will mainly be based on European Product Decleration (EPD), in addition to assumptions and simplifications whennecessary.The research question of this report is; "Which bridge solution is most preferablefor the replacement ofStrauman 3 when it is evaluated against emissions of CO2-­‐equivalents and price?".The results show that it is the reinforced B45 bridge that leads tothe lowest amount of CO2emissions while also beingpreferable economically. The cement are the greatest attributer in price and environmental impact. Therefore, the preferable choicefor the replacement ofStrauman 3 isbe the option that contains the least amount of cement.nb_NO
dc.language.isonobnb_NO
dc.publisherUniversitetet i Agder ; University of Agdernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBYG508nb_NO
dc.titleDimensjonering og livsløpsvurdering av ulike broløsninger i betong for å finne et bærekraftig alternativnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500::Bygningsfag: 530::Bygg-, anleggs- og transportteknologi: 532nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber245 s.nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal