Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkreden, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorØverby, Nina Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorSagedal, Linda Reme
dc.contributor.authorVistad, Ingvild
dc.contributor.authorTorstveit, Monica Klungland
dc.contributor.authorSeiler, Hilde Lohne
dc.contributor.authorBere, Elling
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16T08:21:03Z
dc.date.available2018-01-16T08:21:03Z
dc.date.created2016-02-23T11:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2016, 13 (10), .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1479-5868
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2477707
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pregnancy is characterised by large weight gain over a short period, and often a notable change in mode of transportation. This makes pregnancy suitable for examining the plausible, but in the scientific literature still unclear, association between active transportation and weight gain. We hypothesize that women continuing an active mode of transportation to work or school from pre- to early pregnancy will have a lower gestational weight gain (GWG) than those who change to a less active mode of transportation. Methods: We analysed prospective data from the Norwegian Fit for Delivery (NFFD) trial. Between September 2009 and February 2013 606 women were consecutively enrolled in median gestational week 16 (range; 8–20). Of 219 women who used an active mode of transportation (biking, walking, public transportation) pre-pregnancy, 66 (30 %) converted to a less active mode in early pregnancy (“active-less active” group), and 153 (70 %) continued with active transportation (“active-active” group). Pre-pregnancy weight was self-reported. Weight at gestational (GA) weeks 16, 30, 36, and at term delivery was objectively measured. Weight gain was compared between the two groups. Linear mixed effects analysis of the repeated weight measures was performed including the group*time interaction. Results: A significant overall group effect was observed for the four time points together (“active-active” group: 77.3 kg vs. “active-less active” group: 78.8 kg, p = 0.008). The interaction term group*time was significant indicating different weight gain throughout pregnancy for the two groups; the mean differences between the groups were 0.7 kg at week 16, 1.4 kg at week 30, 2.1 kg at week 36, and 2.2 kg at term delivery, respectively. Conclusion: The findings indicate that active transportation is one possible approach to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Keywords: Active transportation, Biking, BMI, Pregnancy, Public transportation, Walking, Weight gainnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleChange in active transportation and weight gain in pregnancynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber9nb_NO
dc.source.volume13nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activitynb_NO
dc.source.issue10nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12966-016-0332-7
dc.identifier.cristin1339210
cristin.unitcode201,18,2,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for folkehelse, idrett og ernæring
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal