Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorThomsen, Bettina
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-23T13:10:40Z
dc.date.available2011-03-23T13:10:40Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/135183
dc.descriptionMasteroppgave i development management- Universitetet i Agder 2010en_US
dc.description.abstractCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) which is a set of standards to which a company subscribes in order to make its impact on society is believed to have potential to contribute to sustainable development and poverty reduction in the world by addressing one or more of the four responsibilities described by Carroll in his CSR Pyramid, and later revisited by Visser. The impacts however will depend on which approach a business chooses. Therefore, this study takes the stand that it no longer is a discussion about whether or not a company has a role to play in development and reducing poverty in developing countries, but rather a discussion about how they can contribute. Three different approaches used by foreign companies with operations in Mozambique acting social responsible have been compared. The approaches are; an integrated approach, a business-to-business partnership approach and last, a social community investment approach. There is not enough evidence to find a common definition and understanding of CSR in the three cases. The Danish approach is much wider compared to the Mozambican approach that has a tendency to focus mainly on philanthropy. Visser is addressing some of the challenges for CSR in Africa due to the social needs - despite decades of aid and development effort (Visser, 2006:31). The study reveals that philanthropic responsibilities supporting employees with e.g. transport, health assistance or access to microfinance can have a positive impact for the employee and their families. Furthermore, legal and ethical responsibilities taking into consideration elements such as workforce and environment can support a company moving towards integrating CSR as part of a company’s business strategy, and hereby move CSR beyond philanthropy. It is not possible to say that one of the approaches is more suitable than the other. On the other hand the study indicates that there is a call for bringing CSR to a level where everyone can participate whether it is an MNE or an SME. It will implicate that each company takes into consideration available resources, being it financial, competences or time before choosing the approach that best suits their business. Key words: CSR in global context, developing countries, Mozambique, businesses activities, applying CSR, philanthropy, social community investment, inclusive business.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversitetet i Agder; University of Agderen_US
dc.subject.classificationUT 503
dc.titleHow do foreing companies understand and practice Corporate Social Responsibility in Mozambique? : a comparative study of three business activities and their approach to CSRen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social anthropology: 250en_US
dc.source.pagenumber98 s.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel