Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndreasen, Eva Mari
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Helen
dc.contributor.authorSteinsbekk, Aslak Irgens
dc.contributor.authorHøigaard, Rune
dc.contributor.authorHaraldstad, Kristin
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T13:41:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T13:41:09Z
dc.date.created2024-01-05T09:56:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationAndreasen, E. M., Berg, H., Steinsbekk, A. I., Høigaard, R. & Haraldstad, K. (2023). The effect of using desktop VR to practice preoperative handovers with the ISBAR approach: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 23, 1-13.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3111147
dc.description.abstractAim The aim was to investigate whether second-year undergraduate nursing students practicing the Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) communication approach in a desktop virtual reality (VR) application had a non-inferior learning outcome compared with the traditional paper-based method when sorting patient information correctly based on the ISBAR structure. Methods A non-inferior parallel group assessor blinded randomized controlled trial, conducted in simulation sessions as part of preparation for clinical placements in March and April 2022. After a 20-minute introductory session, the participants were randomized to self-practice the ISBAR approach for 45 minutes in groups of three in either an interactive desktop VR application (intervention) or traditional paper-based (TP) simulation. The primary outcome concerned the proportion of nursing students who sorted all 11 statements of patient information in the correct ISBAR order within a time limit of 5 min. The predefined, one-sided, non-inferiority limit was 13 percentage points in favor of traditional paper-based simulation. Results Of 210 eligible students, 175 (83%) participated and were allocated randomly to the VR (N = 87) or TP (N = 88) group. Practicing in the desktop VR application (36% of everything correct) was non-inferior to the traditional paper-based method (22% everything correct), with a difference of 14.2 percentage points (95% CI 0.7 to 27.1) in favor of VR. The VR group repeated the simulation 0.6 times more (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7). Twenty percent more (95% CI 6.9 to 31.6) of the students in the VR group reported liked how they practiced. All the other outcomes including the System Usability Scale indicated non-inferiority or were in favor of VR. Conclusions Self-practicing with the ISBAR approach in desktop VR was non-inferior to the traditional paper-based method and gave a superior learning outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe effect of using desktop VR to practice preoperative handovers with the ISBAR approach: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801en_US
dc.source.pagenumber13en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Medical Educationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04966-y
dc.identifier.cristin2221121
dc.source.articlenumber983en_US
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal