Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTalwar, Manish
dc.contributor.authorTalwar, Shalini
dc.contributor.authorKaur, Puneet
dc.contributor.authorIslam, A.K.M. Najmul
dc.contributor.authorDhir, Amandeep
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T11:50:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T11:50:42Z
dc.date.created2021-01-18T12:14:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationTalwar, M., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., Islam, A.K.M.N. & Dhir, A. (2020) Positive and negative word of mouth (WOM) are not necessarily opposites: A reappraisal using the dual factor theory In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020 . DOI:en_US
dc.identifier.issn0969-6989
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734184
dc.description.abstractPrior research has not systematically investigated the enablers and inhibitors in conjunction to measure consumer behavior toward mobile wallets (m-wallets), focusing either on the adoption or the resistance perspective only. Similarly, antecedents and consequences of the dichotomous nature of word of mouth for m-wallets have also remained obscure so far. The present research proposes to address this void in the accumulated learnings by examining both enablers and inhibitors of mobile wallets (m-wallets) as antecedents of valence of word of mouth (positive and negative; PWOM and NWOM, respectively). Grounded in Dual Factor Theory, this study aims to explore consumers’ continued use intentions resulting from the WOM valence. The findings reveal that enablers (perceived information quality, perceived ability, and perceived benefit) drive PWOM, while the inhibitors (perceived cost, perceived risk, and perceived uncertainty) spur NWOM. Furthermore, the results show that only PWOM drives the continuance intentions of m-wallet users. Therefore, the study proves that the antecedents of PWOM are different from those of NWOM.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePositive and negative word of mouth (WOM) are not necessarily opposites: A reappraisal using the dual factor theoryen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Business: 213en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Retailing and Consumer Servicesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102396
dc.identifier.cristin1873125
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal